patching...
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

Orland Financing Luxury Apartments With $63 Million in Bonds

Deal with the developer would double the village's debt, and repayment on the loan and incentive package could take up to 20 years.

 

Orland Park will nearly double its bond debt to finance a 295-unit luxury apartment complex, though staff says money from the Tax Increment Finance district, home rule sales tax and from the complex's renters will keep property taxes from being affected.

The $63,348,138 million needed to fund the Ninety 7 Fifty On the Park project will include a $38 million loan to developer Flaherty and Collins.

The loan is scheduled to be repaid over 10 years as a mortgage. At the end of 10 years, the balance is due in full.

The remaining project money, about $24 million, will be considered an incentive package that must be repaid to the village. In 10 years, the entire property will be assessed. If the property is not valued high enough to generate that $24 million, the village will remain lease holders on the property and Flaherty and Collins will continue to compensate the village for up to 10 more years.

Orland Park will set a line of credit with a bank of about $30 million to start paying the project costs, and when spending on that credit reaches about $15 million, the village will issue between $20 million to $25 million in general obligation bonds. 

When spending on the credit line reaches about another $15 million, the village will again issue between $20 million to $25 million in bonds.

These additional bonds will nearly double the village’s debt, which is now at about $79 million.

The village says it will not push the cost of the debt onto village property owners through taxes, however. Annual abatements, as well as money coming from the apartment complex itself, TIF money and home rule sales tax money, will cover the cost, said Orland Park Finance Director Annmarie Mampe during a press conference Wednesday morning.

“We have no reason to believe project revenues, increment and home sales tax, if necessary, aren’t sufficient to cover the costs of those bonds,” Village Manager Paul Grimes said during the conference.

But this project is not without risk.

“You’re asking me hypothetical, and I’m not going to give you a guarantee on anything,” Grimes said in response to SouthtownStar columnist Phil Kadner’s question whether taxpayers will never be at risk. “Every (general obligation bond) issue in America is pledged to the full faith and credit of the community. That’s a fact of life. This isn’t any different. That said, we’ve strapped this deal with belts and suspenders to ensure there is no impact on taxpayers.”

Orland Park’s village board is expected to vote on the development agreement on Sept. 6. Construction is expected to begin in early October with the board’s blessing, said Flaherty and Collins CEO David Flaherty. While building the entire complex is expected to take about three years, enough units should be built 14 months into the construction that lease-holders could begin moving in then, Flaherty said.

Money from the TIF district, which is expected to net about $650,000 a year, should start arriving in 2015, Mampe said.

Orland Park’s strong credit rating of Aa1 according to Moody’s and AA+ from Standard and Poor’s allows for the village to take out more bonds and still hold a strong rating, said Kevin McCanna, president of Speer Financial, Inc.

The village’s debt ratio, which is a comparison of debt to equalized assessed value, without this project is at about 2.85 percent, and with the project it would go up to about 5.5 percent. Orland Park has a debt ratio limit policy of no higher than 8.625 percent.

A public forum will take place at 6 p.m. Monday, Aug. 29, at the William Vogel Civic Center to discuss the apartment complex deal.

Related Topics: Flaherty and Collins, Luxury apartment complex, Main Street Triangle, Orland Park Luxury Apartments, and Phil Kadner

michaelh76

3:24 pm on Wednesday, August 17, 2011

Although Flaherty & Collins Properties has been in business since 1993 building, constructing and managing multi-family housing in nine states and has 90 properties, totaling 12,000 units, the company has had two projects go into bankruptcy in recent years.

In October 2009, the company filed for Chapter 7 bankruptcy on a 48-story, 419-unit condo tower it was constructing in Charlotte, N.C.

It was followed seven months later when the company filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy on a 274-unit apartment complex in Raleigh, N.C.

“The bankruptcies happened at a time when real estate values deflated because of the economy and (changes in) credit market,” Crossin said.

The Raleigh project had been completed, but the mortgage market situation made it difficult to get permanent financing to pay off the construction loan, even though the complex was 93 percent filled and was already making money, he said.

Reply

Juvenal

4:15 pm on Wednesday, August 17, 2011

So...... no real lender (i.e. a bank or capital company in the business of analyzing risk) will lend these developers money for the project, but that doesn't stop Ms Mampe and Mr. Grimes from saddling the taxpayers with TENS of MILLIONs of dollars in debt and interest costs. If this development is such a sure thing why aren't the banks and capital companies jumping on it?????

Reply
Comment_arrow

PatriotCitizen

4:40 pm on Wednesday, August 17, 2011

Agreed, great comment. I would only add that Grimes and Mampe are just employees of the Village. The real tax spenders are the Village Board members. If Grimes finishes with his contract - he'll just leave to another town.

Megan James

5:19 pm on Wednesday, August 17, 2011

I'm just completely confused as to why the Village doesn't just sell the land to the developers & put them on the hook for all costs. If it's supposed to be that great of a plan & the Developers believe in it's success, then why is the Village taking the chance with using Bonds to pay for it?

Since there is no stopping this, I do try to find a silver lining - it just seems more difficult each day. There are so many regular reports in national and regional newspapers that just enforcing my thinking that this is not the right time for the Village to be using our own money for a project like this.

At the last Village meeting, they mentioned they already had 2 calls from people wishing to be on a wait list - still leaving 293 other units, who's target marketed are 18-25 yr olds primarily. But I don't see how these would be filled with renters of that age group. Unless you're talking 4 roommates per unit, which would be a nightmare for the empty nesters. The 18-21 won't have degrees & their minimum wage jobs can't afford this rent. The 22-25, if they have a degree, according to the redeye, can't get jobs today that pay enough to cover their loans, let alone rent. http://www.redeyechicago.com/news/ct-red-0817-column-bolohan-20110816,0,3304300.story

So without a guarantee, it just doesn't make sense to me to put taxpayers & other residential services potientially at risk for the Bonds not geting paid. We all know that if taxes don't go up, services are cut.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Karen Foley

8:08 pm on Wednesday, August 17, 2011

The Village is acting as the lender. There is not a bank out there willing to finance this development. That in itself is a big red flag.

Rob Siegel

6:18 pm on Wednesday, August 17, 2011

I would like to see the loan structure to the LLC that F & C will create. What skin will the developer have in the game? Joint and several guarantees from F & C and it's principals? If there is a bump in the road, what is F & C's incentive to make the deal work? If there are cost overruns, are they on the hook or does the Village loan them the money? And to prevent what has happened in North Carolina, what is preventing them from walking away from this deal?

Reply

paul cervenka

9:16 pm on Wednesday, August 17, 2011

Lets see, one concrete company, one lumber company, a grocery store, bakery, barber shop, restaurant, a hardware store, a door and window store and a carpet store, among others, all gone. All of them successful tax paying parts of the community employing hundreds with living wage jobs. In it's place, more risk than any venture capitalist would ever take on. Only the taxpayers in Orland Park have any skin in this deal. So again, can we purchase these bonds? Or are they for the elite risk averse special interests that seem to come out on top even when everything turns into a steaming pile. Limited Government (Our Constitution) is supposed to provide for the general basic needs of the people, not compete with the private sector. No private company can compete with endless tax money. I'm not so sure this project even qualifies for being a TIFF district. It wasn't blighted or in need of public funds to improve. And shouldn't the village have waited to see if the $10 million Mall Tax case is won or lost. All on the taxpayers. I hope this ends well, it's a huge gamble, for what?

Reply

Arthur Huff

9:52 pm on Wednesday, August 17, 2011

Why is everyone so upset? If there's anything we've learned lately from the federal government it's that racking up huge debt is a smart idea. <----- This is me being very, very sarcastic.
And nothing ever costs what the government says it will cost. Private businesses can do things a million times more efficiently than the government could dream of. Kinda makes you wonder, as some have pointed out, why this has to be financed by the Village.

Reply

Amy

10:56 pm on Wednesday, August 17, 2011

To Paul's comment....DITTO!!

Reply

frank

11:34 pm on Wednesday, August 17, 2011

Twenty four people were in attendance. The mayor and Grimes read prepared statements and lacked any outward enthusiasm for this project. Their shove it down the throat approach was evident. It's a done deal and F&C couldn't be more happy.
Oh yes, a public meeting at 6 p.m. on the the 29th. Nice dinner time meeting.

When are enough people going to wake up to what's going on.

There are lies, d_ _ lies, and statistics. The trustees, like sheep, will follow their leaders.

Well, I have statistics that show that mayors are voted out and village managers leave also.

<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<

Reply

McGinnisSlough

6:39 am on Thursday, August 18, 2011

I've always thought Dan thought himself a mini-Daley. This is our Block 37. In the late 80s, Chicago tore down landmark buildings on behalf of a developer, the development fell through, and the land sat vacant for more than a decade. There were at least 5 separate failed redevelopment plans that failed over the years. The city got ownership, and gave development rights to the developer who started the development which finally occupies the site. Two developers later the project is now owned by the bank, only in our case, the bank won't be Bank of America, but Bank of Orland Park.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/108_North_State_Street#Block_37

What happens to the other parcels? As they sit vacant, will Orland loan developers money for them as well?

Reply

Paul

9:52 am on Thursday, August 18, 2011

Very Proud in my Village to be Investing in our future!! One HUGE step up for Orland Park!! This will bring Great jobs for years to Orland Park!! Also bringing in more part time workers to work & live in the area increasing sales tax revenues and overall help.. !! and you ask why do it now… lower building costs.. higher rents.. higher demand for rental..

Reply
Comment_arrow

Megan James

11:20 am on Thursday, August 18, 2011

Good for you on being excited! Hope to see your continued enthusiam when the bonds don't get paid & your property/sales taxes , water bills or other fees go up or some other village service you rely on is cut. As Paul Grimes says...there's no guarantee you aren't paying for this.

For me, minimum wage paying, part-time, and or retail jobs aren't "Great jobs" unless I were a teenager or someone just looking to pick up some extra money. "Great jobs" are professional jobs starting at least $50K+ a year w/benefits that can put food on table, clothes on backs & a roof over a family's head.

Also doesn't seem like "more" jobs - more like only replacing the jobs that were forced out when other retailers closed either by eminent domain or by declining economic conditions.

Not being a young adult with parents who give me everything, if I was only working part-time, my extra spending would be based on getting the most of my $. I'd start with shopping at Walmart so my sales taxes would go to Orland Hills. My next stop would be in Frankfort & Mokena, to pay cheaper sales taxes less a couple miles away.

But I would love to be meet the person working only part-time who can afford the monthly rent it would cost to move & live any where in Orland Park. If these part time jobs pay enough to cover this place's rent, my utilities, food & clothes, then sign me up. I'll quite my full time job the next day.

Comment_arrow

Arthur Huff

11:56 am on Thursday, August 18, 2011

Not that one should be picky about jobs in this economy, but what kind of Great (you used the capital g) jobs is this going to bring?

paul cervenka

9:57 am on Thursday, August 18, 2011

Based on the optimism I see with this project, I would have to say those involved are gambling that in 2+ years we will be in great economic times. Please tell the rest of the world. May I suggest to these "I want to be a millionaire types", buy a call option on oil, now. Show me your true conviction. Who would want to be in cash right now? One other thing, isn't Orland Park going to have to spend millions on the water project with Oak Lawn? And I'm worried about the tax case with the Mall owners. Another Indy group. What is it with Indianapolis?

Reply
Comment_arrow

Andrea Williams

10:49 am on Thursday, August 18, 2011

I was wondering the same thing about Indy. I'm going to find out everything I can about the developer. My mom lived in Indy for 20 years, so I will call in a few favors to get the real story on the developer...you know there has to be one - there has to be a reason why they are the only developers willing to touch this project. Also, why farm out the work to Indiana? Doing all this digging is getting a little overwhelming for me, so I decided to start a grass roots meeting/group that can work together on exposing this project for what it is. Check out the name I came up with for the group.....The D.E.C.E.P.T.I.O.N. It stands for: Dissatisfied Everyday Citizens Exposing Political Truths In Orland Now. I've created a blogspot already to disseminate information to the public. http://theorlanddeception.blogspot.com/

Look for thte first meeting to be the week after next. I will post the details here and will also enter an event notice on the Patch once I get a day/time/location nailed down. I hope to see/meet many of you there.

Comment_arrow

JSuzeH

11:10 pm on Thursday, August 18, 2011

Andrea, it's good when citizens are involved but man, you're really involved!! You need to put all this time to good use. All these acronyms, wow!! Are your kids back to school already? Who has this kind of time? I need to get me some!! How do you find the time?

Comment_arrow

Andrea Williams

11:25 pm on Thursday, August 18, 2011

Ah, Suzie Q, I can always count on you to be concerned about my health and quality of life. How lucky am I that you are now concerned with how I spend my time! Newsflash: When you have common sense and more than a few drops of brain juice, it really doesn't take all that much time. Maybe YOUR time could be used more productively by couseling someone who asks and cares for your input in their life.

Comment_arrow

Robert

6:54 pm on Sunday, August 21, 2011

Here is one for William's blog:
Vrdolyak says he met with Hogan and Gorman (Liz Gorman's husband), a onetime Vrdolyak business associate, and jotted down a handwritten note — a copy of which is in the court file — to formalize the deal.

Despite signing the deal, “Vrdolyak did not receive the funds and/or the funds were transferred immediately to” Gorman’s (Liz Gorman) dealership, Vrdolyak claims. Vrdolyak also says he never was given the stake he says he was supposed to have gotten in Midlothian Dodge cars.
http://www.suntimes.com/news/metro/6650391-418/former-ald.-ed-vrdolyak-fighting-law-office-foreclosure

Juvenal

12:09 pm on Thursday, August 18, 2011

Rise up good people of Orland! Don't let these developers play with OPM -- "Other Peoples' Money" -- Your money. if it's a great investment these rich developers should want to put their OWN money into this......

Reply

paul cervenka

2:50 pm on Thursday, August 18, 2011

$1500 for a single and $2000 for a double. Nice. I will rent you my home for $2000 ! Keep in mind, in this economy, contractors are very appreciative for the work. Very appreciative. VERY, VERY, APPRECIATIVE.

Reply

John Fotopoulos

4:57 pm on Thursday, August 18, 2011

Financing luxury apartments on the backs of the working families is insane. The following is a headline that appeared in today's financial news...
NEW YORK (Reuters) - Rising fears of another recession hammered U.S. stocks on Thursday, sending major averages sharply lower in a return to the extreme fluctuations investors endured a week ago.
Our elected officials must be smoking something very powerful!!! There's no other explanation for their actions.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Paul

5:15 pm on Thursday, August 18, 2011

they are average units they are calling luxury.. they are priced under 1500 a month.. they the normal cost to rent currently.. 200k homes 3 bedroom in Orland go for 1600 .. sounds normal to me!! this is a development that will take a few years to build and if we wait that long the cost will double!!

Comment_arrow

JSuzeH

11:14 pm on Thursday, August 18, 2011

This just out 5 hours ago.....
By Katie Karpowicz
NBCChicago.com

updated 8/18/2011 6:16:01 PM ET
Print
Just when you thought safe to avoid a mortgage, renters' futures suddenly look grim.
A new market study shows that a two-year trend of rent increases in Chicago and its suburbs will continue through the fall, according to the Chicago Sun-Times.Studies also show this trend has the potential to reach into next year. Potential homeowners continue to be discouraged by foreclosures, falling home values and tighter standards for mortage loans. They then flee to the rental market.

Megan James

5:29 pm on Thursday, August 18, 2011

@Paul......you are correct, there will be apt under $1500...the lowest, however is still $1000!!! So please...let me know what 18-22 without a real degree paying job is going to be able to afford that? I'd love to apply where they work!

Also..please post the link on $200K 3 bd home going for only $1600. I researched 3 bed ranches in orland and there wasnt one under $2K.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Paul

5:32 pm on Thursday, August 18, 2011

umm in college my 3 bedroom apt was 1400.. in a college town.. we shared it with 3 people( we paid not our parents lol) .. i dont know many 18 year olds who live alone.. if they do they make enough to afford 1500 a month.. if they cant afford it they most likely have a criminal backround or are not applying themselves.. a part time job at min wage should be able to share an apt with 3 friends for 1500 a month!! :)

Comment_arrow

Megan James

7:53 pm on Thursday, August 18, 2011

Really Paul??? You said.... "if they cant afford it they most likely have a criminal backround"...nice! I know I'm not alone on thinking that was a way off based small minded elitest comment. But lets just put that aside and pretend you didn't mean it the way it came off.

As for your college comparision Paul... Let's see....with 295 units @ 3-4 18-25 year olds per unit...you're talking about 885-1180 young single adults living in one concentrated location. I'm curious about all those who are "so for this", how many of you will actually be forced to live within a 4 block radius of this?

Residents, like me, will now be forced to live less then 2 blocks from this complex . And based on your college apt comparison....we can now look forward to non-stop blasting of music, undoubtable hotspot for underage drinkers & possible recreational drug use, not to mention the increased late night screeching of tires and pounding music from the cars driving in and out of there during late hours. .Oh..and add in a few domestic battery calls from the drunking fights that break out during the parties being hosted there. So I'm sure our local law enforcement is going to really look forward to their increased duties of maintaining order there. So yes...this all makes prefect sense and sounds like a Great Idea!!! .

Gee...I really can't understand why there are more on board like you Paul. We all must be crazy.

Paul

8:01 pm on Thursday, August 18, 2011

i didnt mean it the way it may have come off.. but nothing wrong with getting a second job or not going to the bar or casino so much so you can afford the lifestyle you want to live.. im just sick and tired of people complaing about money yet they are living outside their means!!.. if you cant afford it just because someone will finance it doesnt mean you should go buy it !!

thats assuming all the the units were 18-22 year olds.. alot will be single men or women who want to take the train DT.. maybe another portion being single parents or something to that nature.. and if they are wanting to live in that type of "luxury" im guessing they may be above the screeching tires or loud music.. if not its easy to put ordinances in place to prevent that..

and if you live 2 blocks from there now u live 2 blocks from some of the worst maintained apartments in orland park and lets pray to god those get demolished and replaced as well..

i would love to be on the board.. i would start forcing the investment in our infrastructure (commercial )and give tax breaks to those residents who update there homes in a major way!! shall i ask for your support at the next election..

Reply

Megan James

8:42 pm on Thursday, August 18, 2011

While I have to agree that the apartments in our section of the town are not the best. If it wasn't for them, many would not be able to afford a place to live, as other rentals cost to much for them. The majority living there are good people. They live there because they either fell on hard times & are starting over, or others are single parents, families or retirees who would rather pay only for simple basics and have money left over for other basic needs or savings for their family's future, instead of luxuries they don't need.

Instead of demolishing everything that doesn't look brand new & fancy, I prefer our Village finance low cost home improvement loans to help the owners beautify & update their buildings. It sad to me when people look down on others because they can't afford the best of the best.

If you would like to be on the board, I would take time to get to know all the people who live in Orland, rich & poor. I think the next election will show more residents researching & looking for candidates who want to represent their needs. Not just someone who is looking to get into office for their own desires. I'm not saying I don't like some of your ideas, but many need to know you can put residents needs above your own when it matters. For example, in the past 10 years Orland has seen an increase in criminal activity. I want to see plans to get decrease this and protect us more.

Reply

John Paul

9:21 pm on Thursday, August 18, 2011

Come on guys, some of these comments make it sound like this developement will be a combination of a college dorm and Cabrini Green.The idea is that there are some folks who would like to live near the train so they can comute downtown. I'm guessing that they will be younger profesional people who might be saving for a home, perhaps some older folks too who have decided to downsize. With the real estate market being what it is, I'm thinking that there are some people who would prefer to rent until things calm down. We can debate all day how we came to this point, but now we're here and I think that this is about the best option that we have.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Arthur Huff

9:31 pm on Thursday, August 18, 2011

Good points. I'm more worried about the $43 million that was spent to get to this point and the tens of millions more that they plan to spend.

Comment_arrow

frank

10:28 pm on Thursday, August 18, 2011

My comment was to John Paul and still is, "ARE YOU FOR REAL?"

Comment_arrow

Andrea Williams

11:06 pm on Thursday, August 18, 2011

John, why don't you come on over to Colette Highlands. John Fotopoulos and I can walk you to the back of the subdivision and show you how the last piece of property developed under the same theory has been coming along. The Park Station condos have not sold a unit in 3 years and we have a beautiful pit of a foundation that has been sitting there for longer than that. Those condos - ironically one train station up the road - was designed to house the down-sizing empty nesters and young commuters. Two developers later, it has been turned back over to the bank with no movement in sight. There is no financially sound way out - if Musa couldn't make it work (his own mother bought a condo in the building for crying out loud!) no one will. Unfortunately, if the McLaughlin Triangle suffers the same fate - which is more than likely as it faces even tougher economic conditions than the Park Station condos - the "bank" is the taxpayers. Sod and a basseball diamond is a better option than this irresponsible, ill-conceived plan.

Comment_arrow

Karen Foley

6:54 am on Friday, August 19, 2011

Question for the Legal Eagles: If the village owns the apartments, does that make it public housing? If is is public housing how many units will be disginated for low income families. How long before HUD knocks on the door of a publicly owned complex. I would be more comfortable if the development was geared toward 55 plus. The twenty somethings do not have the job prospects to pay the rent.

Comment_arrow

Megan James

7:28 am on Friday, August 19, 2011

@John Paul - While in today's market it may make sense to rent instead of buy, what's going to happen in 5-10 years when the Real Estate Market finally rebounds and people go back to buying instead of renting? Please....lets try to think of long term...not just in today's economy. That's what happened to the Laurels in Justice. They started off as a apartment complex with tons of amenities for the young professional commuting downtown. But when the real estate market gave them the opprotunity to buy at cheaper rates then renting, they moved out. And when the landlords couldn't fill the apartments at the higher rents, they lowered their rates. And now, its over run by illegal activities and has destroyed both that part of town and neighboring sections of Hickory Hills. But at least no bond were used to finance that one.

Comment_arrow

John Paul

9:55 pm on Friday, August 19, 2011

Yes Frank, I'm for real. Like I said, from this point forward, this makes the most sense. Once the real estate market picks up, I would guess that this developement will go condo.

JSuzeH

11:20 pm on Thursday, August 18, 2011

sorry here's the rest of the article...
The lack of vacancies caused by this influx, combined with the lack of new apartment complexes being built each year except in the downtown area has caused a high demand for rental space -- leading to higher month's rates.Some of the most popular rental neighborhoods like Lincoln Park, Gold Coast and some suburbs can expect increases as high as 3.4 percent this year, a substantial rise from 2010's 2.5 percent increase."We can certinaly confirm [the high demand for apartment rentals] because we're on the front lines dealing with landlords every day," said Andrew Porter, chief operating officer at Chicago apartment rental service domu. "Apartments are leasing much faster and much earlier in the season than ever before."

.
Rent increases are expected to rise 2.9 percent in the Chicago area this year -- up from 2.2 percent in 2010 -- according to a report released by real estate investors Marcus & Millichap.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Megan James

9:31 am on Friday, August 19, 2011

@JSUZEH

You may want to check out this article too:

http://www.suntimes.com/7143685-417/very-ambitious-plan-proposed-to-redevelop-atrium-village.html

Here's a developer who is already in downtown Chicago with an existing apartment complex that they want to expand. Not only does it show the city is only involved in "zoning" not financing, but it proves my point about rent rates in downtown Chicago as being more reasonable than what Orland is offering. I work not to far from this River North section, and its nice.

"For the market-rate housing, the project foresees substantial rent increases. One example the developers offered, based on a market survey of the area, showed that monthly rents for a two-bedroom apartment might rise to $1,890 a month from the current $1,303."

If I were a young professional and had the chance to live downtown in a 2bd apartment at either their current rate of $1303, or even their projected increased rate of $1890, it's still a heck of a lot cheaper then Orland. Plus, I wouldn't have to pay $128 monthly train pass (soon to b increased by 20%), & be closer to more shopping, restuarants, bars and other activities then Orland has.

Its seems like those jumping on board are not thinking outside the box, or ask the right questions.

What happens when the real estate market swings back around & it makes more sense to buy then rent again. What happens if there's not enough $ pay off the bonds or developers default on their $38m loan.

Karen Foley

6:59 am on Friday, August 19, 2011

Lincoln Park, Gold Coast. Close to jobs and low cost transportation, walking distance to work. No need for a car or train fees. You are comparing apples to watermelons. This is not a "Field of Dreams". Build it and they will come! Jobs first, housing later.

Reply

PatriotCitizen

1:55 pm on Friday, August 19, 2011

Interesting quotes from Thomas Jefferson:
--> To compel a man to subsidize with his taxes the propagation of ideas which he disbelieves and abhors is sinful and tyrannical.
--> It is incumbent on every generation to pay its own debts as it goes. A principle which if acted on would save one-half the wars of the world.
--> I predict future happiness for Americans if they can prevent the government from wasting the labors of the people under the pretense of taking care of them.
--> My reading of history convinces me that most bad government results from too much government.
--> I believe that banking institutions are more dangerous to our liberties than standing armies. If the American people ever allow private banks to control the issue of their currency, first by inflation, then by deflation, the banks and corporations that will grow up around the banks will deprive the people of all property - until their children wake-up homeless on the continent their fathers conquered.

Reply

MS

4:58 pm on Friday, August 19, 2011

Oh great Patriot. Lo, the words of our other predecessors too:

"The business of America is business." -- Calvin Coolidge

"Every power vested in a government is in its nature sovereign, and includes by force of the term a right to employ all the means requisite...to the attainment of the ends of such power." Alexander Hamilton's Opinion on the Constitutionality of the Bank (1791-02-23)

"It is a maxim deeply ingrafted in that dark system, that no character, however upright, is a match for constantly reiterated attacks, however false." -Alexander Hamilton

"Drive thy business or it will drive thee." -- Benjamin Franklin

"The only limit to our realization of tomorrow will be our doubts of today." -- Franklin D. Roosevelt

Anyway, the point is, I can come up with any number of quotes from great Americans that will basically counter any other great American's quotes...

Reply
Patch_comments_icon

Ben Feldheim

1:56 pm on Saturday, August 20, 2011

Kids, stay on topic instead of the childish swipes.

Reply
Comment_arrow

PatriotCitizen

10:35 am on Sunday, August 21, 2011

Ben - thanks for the reminder. I just happened to be reading about Thomas Jefferson and was amused and amazed by the quotes considering the time frame they were made and today's local political climate.

Back on topic - I'm still concerned that this project is being partly funded by the Orland Park taxpayers given in recent times Village Manager Grimes asked all the unions for concessions and layed off several Village employees due to having a budget deficit. One to two years later - the Village is now funding projects? Is there a record of the purchases along Lagrange Rd?

Andrea Williams

3:35 pm on Saturday, August 20, 2011

Learned a new word today. Misfeasance: the wrongful performance of a normally lawful act; the wrongful and injurious exercise of lawful authority. I wonder if the Orland Park trustees are familar with the word...

Reply

Tim Gockel

1:54 pm on Friday, August 26, 2011

I've only lived in Orland Park for five years (moved here from Oak Park) but I'm happy to have a mayor with the testicular fortitude to disregard the nattering naysayers and get this town moving forward instead of stagnating in the past.

Reply

Karen Foley

9:40 am on Saturday, August 27, 2011

TIm....its the financing, growth and development is great, just not on the backs of the taxpayer. This means you. The risk is on the village not the developer.

Reply

Leave a comment