patching...
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

Village Looking For Extra Set of Eyes on the Ninety 7 Fifty Site

A recap of the village's committee and board of trustees meeting on Monday, Oct. 3.

 

For about $270,000, village trustees will consider later this month whether to hire U.S. Equities as an additional supervisor on the upcoming Ninety 7 Fifty site.

U.S. Equities, acting as the owner’s agent—in this case Orland Park and Fifth Third Bank—would be responsible for overseeing preconstruction, construction and close-out management services.

To give the lenders an additional level of control over the project, the duties of U.S. Equities would include design review, construction bid document review, project budget tracking, change order reviews, schedule monitoring and more, according to a village statement.

This ensures that the developer “can’t draw from that escrow fund until our owner’s agent signs off," Village Manager Paul Grimes said. "It really is an extra set of suspenders.”

Village Finance Director Annmarie Mampe noted that the village hired an owner's agent during construction of the new police station.

The Village’s Finance Committee, headed by Trustee Brad O’Halloran, endorsed the contract. It goes before the full village board on Monday, Oct. 17, for vote. If approved, a budget adjustment of $270,427 in the village’s Main Street Triangle TIF Fund is required.

Other notable discussions and resolutions approved at Monday’s committee and board meetings:

Related Topics: Fifth Third Bank, Miroballi Shoes, Ninety 7 Fifty, Oak Lawn water, Orland Park, Randy's Market, U.S. Equities, and geocache

Andrea Williams

10:28 am on Wednesday, October 5, 2011

Tell the CEO of Fifth Third Bank what you think about the loan they are making to village for the McLaughlin Triangle. kevin.kabat@53.com

Reply
Comment_arrow

freddie

11:09 am on Wednesday, October 5, 2011

Thanks Andrea. I just emailed Mr Kabat and thanked him and his bank for supporting this project.

Comment_arrow

Andrea Williams

11:53 am on Wednesday, October 5, 2011

Excellent. Glad I could help. Everyone's opinion counts.

Moreen Kass

3:17 pm on Wednesday, October 5, 2011

Andrea, probably a better way to send a message is to withdraw your business with 5/3 Bank if you dont agree with the project. i think that would send a strong message to the bank. Tell the branch manager that you are withdrawing your accounts because of the financing deal. If enough reisdents do this, I am sure it will get attention.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Andrea Williams

5:04 pm on Wednesday, October 5, 2011

You make an excellent point and If I had any business with 5th/3rd I would definitely do that Moreen. I do plan on sending letters to the branch managers and would encourage others to do the same. I spent years in Product Marketing within large corporations and can tell you that any correspondence going to the CEOs and Chairmans are read with interest. Of course, they aren't read by the top dogs but they have people whose responsibility it is to handle that communication. At AT&T it was called "Executive Appeals" and if one landed on your desk, you'd better handle it with the utmost care and priority or you would find yourself in some seriously hot water. So, my message to the residents of Orland Park is to take the time to write a quick note - it will be read and noted. If enough people do this, it will likely get attention within the organization.

paul cervenka

7:58 pm on Wednesday, October 5, 2011

25 million dollars is what Orland Park taxpayers paid for the 159th and La Grange Road intersection rebuild. These are state roads. Zero $ from the state. What moron decided to spend our money this way? 23 million in state funding ? to cross METRA tracks on 143rd St widening project but I see it stops just before the eminent domain railroad property exists. What no 4 lane over the tracks! great place for a bottle neck. 6 lanes to 2. Excellent. What study thought this out? Can't get 200' of 139th street built for any amount. Metra is doing it's own bridge track work over La Grange Rd. At who's expense? This town is drowning in unbridled political ignorance. Why do they have to advertise it twice a month though.

Reply

Megan James

9:46 am on Thursday, October 6, 2011

I think I missed something and don't have time to re-read all the documents on the Village website. Can someone explain to me how 5th/3rd Bank suddenly got involved in this project? I thought the whole point of this being financed through the Village, via Bonds, was to prevent a bank from being involved with any decisions should the developers default on their loans. Not trying to be negative...I'm just wondering what I missed that explains why the 5th/3rd bank is suddendly involved. Thanks

Reply

OrlandParker

12:40 pm on Thursday, October 6, 2011

Megan,

This is an interim step as the funding need to get the project started is immediate, and the sale of General Obligation Bonds will take time before they are prepared and offered on the open market. The Village is securing a loan with 5th/3rd to be backed and paid off when the GO Bonds have been sold.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Megan James

1:28 pm on Thursday, October 6, 2011

@OrlandParker - Thanks for taking time to explain this. I really appreciate it.

OrlandParker

12:49 pm on Thursday, October 6, 2011

@ Paul,

The funding for most of the state roadways improvements Orland has accomplished has been funded by the home rule sales tax. So Orland and non-Orland residents who shop or dine in town are paying for improvements. Most of these roadway improvements would never have been made if it weren't for the home rule tax funding Orland is collecting. These roadway projects are part of a "State and Federal" list; however, securing funding is pretty difficult. The Village set-up the tax so they could complete the required engineering phases and partial funding so the improvements could be made much sooner than the State or Federal governments coming up with all the funding. Because of that the projects are pushed up on the list faster. You are correct, the State may never pay Orland back for all they invested; however, it was a tax designed for this purpose and not borne on just Orland Park residents. I hope that helps clarify things.

Reply

OrlandParker

1:14 pm on Thursday, October 6, 2011

My concern is the 9750 project will be tapping into these same home rule sales tax proceeds to pay back the GO Bonds should the project require funding. If that is the case the funding for further road improvements are at risk.

Reply

paul cervenka

1:31 pm on Thursday, October 6, 2011

While on my bicycle ride today I talked with engineers at the site... the 143rd roadway crossing the Metra tracks will be done as another project after Metra re-aligns it's tracks over La Grange road and extends the curent double track another 1000+ feet across 143rd St. This will correct the platform single track issue that the station currently deals with loading and unloading passengers on the same track in both directions. Metra is doing all it's own work. When this is completed, 143rd St will be widened. Not sure how this impacts the SW highway interchange. I still think an on ramp to SW highway for westbound traffic needs to be put on La Grange Rd at 135th St. avoiding the intersection at 143rd all together. Along with a toll both of course.

Reply
Comment_arrow

MS

9:19 am on Friday, October 7, 2011

A ramp to Southwest Highway? To cut through Forest Preserve property and be built over bogs and wetlands? And then you cry about wasting money? Do you even know how much that would cost, sir?? Not only would you be degrading a beautiful forest and wetland for a bloody unsightly highway on-ramp, you would be disturbing people's homes and private property... and the price on such a bridge to nowhere would be phenomenally high. All in the name of conveniently driving past 143rd and La Grange.

This is what I dont get about ideas people have for road projects. Dude, you're in a car. Sitting in a comfortable seat. In air conditioned space. Not on a donkey. Not walking it. Not carrying a ton of things. Deal with the road and be patient instead of destroying our local wildlife habitats for a 3 minute convenience trip.

Tim

10:05 am on Sunday, July 15, 2012

I hope the new apartment building includes the federally mandated 10% low income! Get your waivers ready.

Reply

Leave a comment