patching...
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!
Local Voices

Orland Park Attorney Announces for 135 School Board

Longtime Civic Volunteer Cites Reasons for Run

Mike Carroll is a familiar face in Orland Park. For the last three decades, the local attorney has volunteered with a number of community organizations.

Carroll’s civic involvement dates back to the mid-1980s when he first volunteered for the village’s Emergency Services and Disaster Agency (ESDA). He has been affiliated with the Orland Park Lions Club for more than 15 years, is a past president and currently serves as the group’s secretary. Carroll is a past recipient of the Lions International's coveted Melvin Jones Award, the highest recognition of exemplary service to the member's club and the community it serves.

The former Orland Park police officer and communication training officer is a founding member of the Orland Park Law Enforcement Organization (OPLEO) and is a past president of the Southwest Bar Association. Carroll has served as an assistant coach with the Orland Youth Association and is currently an assistant cubmaster and den leader for Orland Park Cub Scout Pack 383.

“I don’t consider myself a politician,” Carroll said, “I’m a volunteer.”

“All of my civic activities --- since I’ve lived in Orland Park --- have been in a volunteer capacity. The fact that you must be elected to volunteer your time for the school board is simply a reality,” Carroll said. Carroll has filed to run for the Orland School District 135 School Board in the local elections to be held on April 9, 2013.

The longtime village resident moved to the community as a child in 1976 and is an alumnus of District 135 and Carl Sandburg High School. He graduated from Northern Illinois University before receiving his law degree from John Marshall.

“Why am I volunteering?” Carroll asked. “First, I’ve been startled and disheartened with the lack of civility at some of the school board meetings,” he said. “The board members are all volunteers and they owe each other respect, treating each other with common decency. Unfortunately, this hasn’t been happening at District 135,” Carroll said.

Carroll and his wife, Jennifer (Gobeille), are both graduates of District 135 and their two sons are currently students in the district.

“Secondly, I believe that personal agendas have caused certain board members to take actions contrary to the common good,” Carroll said. “One example is breaking the longstanding inter-governmental agreement with the Village of Orland Park for the use of ballfields and other facilities,” he said.

“Most taxpayers don’t realize that the school board voting to end its decades long agreement with the village is costing the taxpayers money,” Carroll said. “We are paying for the school district to maintain these ballfields that had for years been tended to by the village’s Parks Department, all because personal agendas were given a higher priority than what was a win-win situation for Orland School District 135 and the Village of Orland Park. It just doesn’t make sense,” he said.

Carroll’s legal background is general practice with concentrations in criminal law, real estate and municipal and administrative law. He has completed more than 250 trials and hearings as lead counsel. Carroll also serves as an administrative hearing officer, judging thousands of locally adjudicated offenses in a number of suburbs. He has served as a legal affairs officer and as a village prosecutor for area municipalities, along with serving as an instructor for the Northeast Multi-Regional Training Program and at Robert Morris University.

“Another area that concerns me as a taxpayer and as a District 135 parent is the personnel decisions that have led to costly lawsuits,” the attorney said. “School board members are elected to serve the taxpayers who feel they’re the best volunteers for the job. You’re not elected to cost the taxpayers more money,” Carroll said.

Carroll's third area of concern includes the district's services for special education. "As the parent of a child who relies on special education services, I want to ensure
that District 135 is among the best, keeping up with the advancements in special education and in assistive technology."

“Finally, I disagree with the current board’s recent decision to levy the maximum increase on taxes possible, 3.0%, and to blame the teachers’ new contract as the reason when evidence suggests that a small --- perhaps even 0.5% --- increase or no increase at all for the immediate future would have sufficed,” Carroll noted.

“School districts comprise the largest portion of a resident’s property bill and the residents of Orland School District 135 deserve representation that will act on their behalf, not getting into expensive lawsuits, raising taxes for no reason and jeopardizing the district’s reputation,” Carroll said.

“The District 135 School Board needs to act in the best interest of the children and the taxpayers who foot the bill, leaving personal opinions and relationships aside,” Carroll said, “I’m volunteering to help District 135 get back on track because this has not been happening with some of the current board members.”

“Everyone in Orland School District 135 has a vested interest in our schools whether you have kids in the district or not,” Carroll said. “Those of us with kids in the schools want the best education possible for our children and property owners know that local schools have a direct effect on property values and whether or not people want to live here,” he said.

“I’ve lived in the district for almost 40 years and I’ve been active in the community for almost as long,” Carroll said, adding, “I know the Orland Park community. I know our schools and I know that I can help Orland School District 135.”

Area residents are invited to help with Carroll’s campaign by liking his Facebook page at Michael F. Carroll for Orland District 135 or by emailing mikecarrollfor135@gmail.com.

Steven Williams

8:55 am on Friday, January 4, 2013

He is saying all the right things. As the campaign progresses, I'll be interested to hear some specifics on how he plans to represent taxpayers in, not only keeping the levy flat, but also, rooting out unnecessary spending that will help property owners see some savings. I'm certainly planning to share my opinions with all the candidates based on what I have seen on my visits to District 135 schools. Looking forward to this election cycle in the school districts.

Reply

GIgi

11:07 am on Sunday, January 6, 2013

I like the idea of an attorney being on the board. They seem to need one frequently!

Reply

Off the top of my Head

11:32 pm on Friday, March 1, 2013

Maybe not the levy, but re: "unnecessary spending," I think Mr. Carroll has his path cut out. For starters, he can make sure: that our tax money is going to only ONE superintendent at a time, that there is only ONE curriculum director at a time, & stick to the district employing only ONE special education director at a time (that's at least $300,000.) If Mr. Carroll can keep his fellow board member's personal vendettas in check; hiring/firing without due cause can be another $100,000 in attorney's fees alone. I know that doesn't dent our taxes, but w/this present group, can we assume there might be other lawsuits on the horizon? For instance, conducting their own Supt. search= risk of problems. Theoretically, if Board members would engage in unprofessional conversations/ if board members do not maintain confidentiality of the applicants, it could lead to lawsuits. Personal differences & vindictiveness is not a good base for decision-making. Possibility of lawsuit increases, if board members do not realize they are held to higher standards & cannot act as individuals or outside public meetings. If action is taken by listening to &/or acting on gossip- that puts the district at risk. If the majority of the board is firing/moving employees based on nonfactual information, it can lead to lawsuits; defamation, unfair hiring practices, etc. For Mr. Carroll, getting on the board- changing the board's culture & putting focus back on education- will "root out unnecessary spending."

Reply

Kathy

3:31 pm on Tuesday, March 5, 2013

The 135 board talked about back ground checks, I found this out about the Gentile’s. Her husband owned a company the took over $2 Million dollars from Illinois tax taxpayers. Click the website below.

http://www.icc.illinois.gov/docket/files.aspx?no=10-0379&docId=168549

Download Exhibit 2.0 – Dr. Qin Liu March 2011 Testimony

In total, IQT obtained $1,426,877 in federal low income support between January and November of 2010. Of this amount, it is properly eligible for only $1,271, which it received as facilities-based LEC. It is ineligible for $1,425,606, which it received as a reseller or for customers that it served through resale. Put 1353 differently, it is eligible for only 0.09%, but ineligible for 99.91%, of the $1,426,877 federal low income support amount requested and obtained during between January and November of 2010.

Reply

Sue W

5:39 pm on Tuesday, March 5, 2013

I am surprised I have not seen any comments!!!

Illinois tax taxpayers. Click the website below

http://www.icc.illinois.gov/docket/files.aspx?no=10-0379&docId=168549

Download Exhibit 2.0 – Dr. Qin Liu June 29th 2011 Testimony

IQT has not managed both its Lifeline and Linkup Programs properly. It has made genuine efforts to get customers on the Lifeline program but has refused to make efforts to keep them on the program. In doing so, it has drained $1.2 million in federal Linkup support funds without much of the intended benefits to the customers, and has deprived 96% of the customers them of their eligibility for further Linkup suppor
99% of its total receipts from the USAC since 2008. 899 Total Amounts of Improperly Collected Federal Low Income Support
Period Lifeline Linkup TLS Total
Oct 08- Dec 10 $524,818.80 $1,211,463.00 $198,778.14 $1,935,059.94
Oct 08 - Mar 11 $546,650.28 $1,218,383.10 $201,303.63 $1,966,337.01

Reply

Leave a comment