.

More Journalism Orgs Support Patch in Confidential Source Battle

Illinois News Broadcasters Association, Radio Television and Digital News Association and National Press Club released statements in support of Patch editor Joe Hosey as he faces jail time and fines for protecting a source.

Patch editor Joe Hosey
Patch editor Joe Hosey

Two more journalism organizations have joined the swell of criticism to a Will County judge’s decision to hold Patch editor Joe Hosey in contempt of court for not revealing a confidential source.

The Illinois News Broadcasters Association, Radio Television and Digital News Association and National Press Club each released statements criticizing Judge Gerald Kinney for not acknowledging the Illinois shield law, which has been in effect since 1982.

“If Kinney prevails, then there are no guarantees,” said Bob Roberts, WBBM News broadcaster and Freedom of Information Chair of the Illinois News Broadcasters Association. “The shield law becomes an empty shell. States replicate each other, so if you gut the shield law here it will start happening in other states soon.”

On Sept. 20, Kinney ordered that Hosey be held in “minor direct criminal contempt” for not giving up the source of investigative reports that detailed the grisly Hickory Street murders in Joliet. Hosey's prescribed punishment for maintaining confidentiality was $1,000 fine, $300 in fines for every day he does not divulge the source from Aug. 29 on up to 180 days and then incarceration.

Patch Media has appealed the ruling and the fines have been placed on hold pending the appeal.

The INBA board unanimously passed a resolution condemning Kinney’s action and supporting Hosey at a September board meeting. All attendees at a subsequent INBA convention also supported the resolution. The RTDNA backed the INBA’s resolution shortly thereafter. The Illinois Press Association also followed suit in support of Hosey, according to Jennifer Fuller, immediate past INBA president and broadcaster on WSIU Public Radio in Carbondale.

“Nobody is saying no here,” Roberts said. “It’s far bigger than one guy working for a news outlet in the Joliet area. It’s awful when people are penalized for doing their job. The founding fathers knew the 1st Amendment shouldn’t go down easily, even if it caused outrage and anguish. That’s why they wrote and wrote it first. They wanted a free exchange of ideas. They wanted people to find the news and report it fairly and accurately and that’s what Joe does.”

Fuller said Hosey’s case and Kinney’s ruling are further proof of a need for a federal shield law for reporters. The chilling effect could be seen in reporters unwilling to use information from unnamed sources, but also it could dissuade people from speaking to reporters in the future, Fuller said.

“Journalists are banding together because this is wrong,” Fuller said. “We support Joe Hosey and we all deserve this protection.”

The National Press Club criticized Kinney's ruling, and cited Illinois' shield law as reason against the contempt order. 

The Society of Professional Journalists, as well as its Chicago branch the Chicago Headline Club, also have made statements against Kinney’s ruling and in support of Joe Hosey.

Read the associations’ statements and coverage:

 

Related Patch Coverage:

 

Tye September 30, 2013 at 04:46 PM
I get the part about defense attorney Bretz getting his 15 minutes of face time and mileage out of the action he brought before Judge Kinney. Bretz can join the ranks of the Drew Peterson lawyers. You know, with the big heads and egos to match, and spiffy sunglasses. What I don't get is, if Judge Kinney is against Freedom of the Press and anonymous sources talking to reporters, why is he using Joe Hosey as his target by ruling for heavy fines and threats of imprisonment? All based on a local reporter relying on an unnamed source to do a local murder story? This isn't Deep Throat meets Hickory Street. What's up with this judge? I've seen a few judges in action--they spit, spew, scream, yell, belittle, demean and ridicule if it suits them. I imagine their heads would spin around like Linda Blair's did in the Exorcist if it was humanly possible. But what is the point here?
Lauren Traut September 30, 2013 at 04:50 PM
Proud of the way the journalism community is coming together in support of one of its own. Behind you all the way, Joe!
Arthur Huff September 30, 2013 at 06:55 PM
I would suspect that the report could only have been leaked by someone with the police department or the prosecutor's office. Surely they must have a short list of "suspects," so why not subpoena those people to testify and hold them in contempt as well? Is this an ego thing on the part of the judge because some dared to violate his gag order, or is this a witch hunt to ruin someone's career...perhaps because they already know who it was??
Gregg CreativeChicago Realtor-Slapak September 30, 2013 at 08:29 PM
"Bunk"! Keep on "spinin" yourself, Patch.com, in hopes of revitalizing your public exposure!
Jim Kotecki October 01, 2013 at 10:58 AM
Arthur: From what a previous report suggested, the judge already questioned a large number of people in a fishing expedition to find out who might have released it and nobody fessed up. Gregg: Thanks for signing up as a member of the group of fools that read and comment on patch articles all the while disparaging them and their efforts. I'd love for Patch to get more exposure and take off. Local news that applies to where I live versus being stuck reading mainly about Chicago with some runoff for the suburbs sounds good to me. Plus it's free so stfu.
frank October 01, 2013 at 11:17 AM
Are we investigating the judge? We should! ########################
Arthur Huff October 01, 2013 at 11:27 AM
Thanks Jim. I guess it's time to do some research on this case. It's getting interesting.

Boards

More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something